You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficiency and safety of varying the frequency of whole blood donation (INTERVAL): a randomised trial of 45 000 donors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31928-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Simon G Thompson, Stephen Kaptoge, Carmel Moore, Matthew Walker, Jane Armitage, Willem H Ouwehand, David J Roberts, John Danesh, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Simon G Thompson, Stephen Kaptoge, Carmel Moore, Matthew Walker, Jane Armitage, Willem H Ouwehand, David J Roberts, John Danesh, Jane Armitage, John Danesh, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Jenny Donovan, Ian Ford, Rachel Henry, Beverley J Hunt, Bridget Le Huray, Susan Mehenny, Gail Miflin, Carmel Moore, Willem H Ouwehand, Jane Green, David J Roberts, Mike Stredder, Simon G Thompson, Matthew Walker, Nicholas A Watkins, Alan McDermott, Clive Ronaldson, Claire Thomson, Zoe Tolkien, Lorna Williamson, David Allen, John Danesh, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Rachel Henry, Susan Mehenny, Carmel Moore, Willem H Ouwehand, David J Roberts, Jennifer Sambrook, Matthew Walker, Tracey Hammerton, Claire Thomson, Zoe Tolkien, David Allen, David Bruce, Fizzah Choudry, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Cedric Ghevaert, Kirstie Johnston, Anne Kelly, Andrew King, Susan Mehenny, Gail Miflin, Alfred Mo, Carmel Moore, Willem H Ouwehand, Lizanne Page, Penny Richardson, David J Roberts, Jennifer Sambrook, Peter Senior, Yagnesh Umrania, Matthew Walker, Henna Wong, Stephen Kaptoge, Gavin Murphy, Adrian C Newland, Keith Wheatley, Michael Greaves, Marc Turner, Tahir Aziz, Richard Brain, Christine Davies, Ruth Turner, Paula Wakeman, Alison Dent, Alan Wakeman, Ben Anthony, Desmond Bland, Will Parrondo, Helen Vincent, Candy Weatherill, Andrea Forsyth, Carol Butterfield, Tracey Wright, Karen Ellis, Kirstie Johnston, Pat Poynton, Carolyn Brooks, Emma Martin, Lara Littler, Lindsay Williams, Donna Blair, Karen Ackerley, Lynn Woods, Sophie Stanley, Gemma Walsh, Gayle Franklin, Cheryl Howath, Sarah Sharpe, Deborah Smith, Lauren Botham, Caroline Williams, Claire Alexander, Gareth Sowerbutts, Diane Furnival, Michael Thake, Shilpa Patel, Carolyn Roost, Sandra Sowerby, Mary Joy Appleton, Eileen Bays, Geoff Bowyer, Steven Clarkson, Stuart Halson, Kate Holmes, Gareth Humphries, Kirstie Johnston, Lee Parvin-Cooper, Jason Towler, Joanne Addy, Patricia Barrass, Louise Stennett, Susan Burton, Hannah Dingwall, Rachel Henry, Victoria Clarke, Maria Potton, Claire Thomson, Thomas Bolton, Michael Daynes, Stuart Halson, Sarah Spackman, Matthew Walker, Abudu Momodu, James Fenton, Adam King, Omer Muhammed, Nicholas Oates, Tim Peakman, Christine Ryan, Kristian Spreckley, Craig Stubbins, Joanna Williams, James Brennan, Cedric Mochon, Samantha Taylor, Kimberley Warren, Stephen Kaptoge, Simon G Thompson, Emanuele Di Angelantonio, Carmel Moore, Jonathan Mant, Willem H Ouwehand, Simon G Thompson, John Danesh, David J Roberts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 180 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 48 | 27% |
| Saudi Arabia | 22 | 12% |
| United States | 12 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Finland | 2 | 1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 109 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 34 | 19% |
| Scientists | 30 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 233 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 74 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 91 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 288. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2024.
All research outputs
#123,847
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,676
of 42,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,632
of 326,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#41
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.