↓ Skip to main content

Core outcomes in periodontal trials: study protocol for core outcome set development

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Core outcomes in periodontal trials: study protocol for core outcome set development
Published in
Trials, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2169-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas J. Lamont, Jan E. Clarkson, David N. J. Ricketts, Peter A. Heasman, Craig R. Ramsay

Abstract

There are a large number of clinical outcome measures used to assess the effectiveness of prevention and management strategies of periodontal diseases. This heterogeneity causes difficulties when trying to synthesise data for systematic reviews or clinical guidelines, reducing their impact. Core outcome sets are an agreed, standardised list of outcomes that should be measured and reported in all trials in specific clinical areas. We aim to develop a core outcome set for effectiveness trials investigating the prevention and management of periodontal disease in primary or secondary care. To identify existing outcomes we screened the Cochrane systematic reviews and their included studies on the prevention and management of periodontal diseases. The core outcome set will be defined by consensus of key stakeholders using an online e-Delphi process and face-to-face meeting. Key stakeholders involved in the development will include: patients, dentists, hygienists/therapists, specialists, clinical researchers and policy-makers. Stakeholders will be asked to prioritise outcomes and feedback will be provided in the next round(s). Stakeholders will have an opportunity to add outcomes found in the Cochrane review screening process at the end of the first round. If consensus is not reached after the second round we will provide feedback prior to a third round. Remaining outcomes will be discussed at a face-to-face meeting and agreement will be measured via defined consensus rules of outcome inclusion. The inclusive consensus process should provide a core outcome set that is relevant to all key stakeholders. We will actively disseminate our findings to help improve clinical trials, systematic reviews and clinical guidelines with the ultimate aim of improving the prevention and management of periodontal diseases. COMET ( http://www.comet-initiative.org/studies/details/265?result=true ). Registered on August 2012.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 32%