↓ Skip to main content

Learning directed acyclic graphs from large-scale genomics data

Overview of attention for article published in EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning directed acyclic graphs from large-scale genomics data
Published in
EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13637-017-0063-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabio Nikolay, Marius Pesavento, George Kritikos, Nassos Typas

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the problem of learning the genetic interaction map, i.e., the topology of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) of genetic interactions from noisy double-knockout (DK) data. Based on a set of well-established biological interaction models, we detect and classify the interactions between genes. We propose a novel linear integer optimization program called the Genetic-Interactions-Detector (GENIE) to identify the complex biological dependencies among genes and to compute the DAG topology that matches the DK measurements best. Furthermore, we extend the GENIE program by incorporating genetic interaction profile (GI-profile) data to further enhance the detection performance. In addition, we propose a sequential scalability technique for large sets of genes under study, in order to provide statistically significant results for real measurement data. Finally, we show via numeric simulations that the GENIE program and the GI-profile data extended GENIE (GI-GENIE) program clearly outperform the conventional techniques and present real data results for our proposed sequential scalability technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 41%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Lecturer 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Engineering 2 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 4 24%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#22,963,239
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#42
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,799
of 325,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics & Systems Biology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them