| Title |
The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31634-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott A Lear, Weihong Hu, Sumathy Rangarajan, Danijela Gasevic, Darryl Leong, Romaina Iqbal, Amparo Casanova, Sumathi Swaminathan, R M Anjana, Rajesh Kumar, Annika Rosengren, Li Wei, Wang Yang, Wang Chuangshi, Liu Huaxing, Sanjeev Nair, Rafael Diaz, Hany Swidon, Rajeev Gupta, Noushin Mohammadifard, Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo, Aytekin Oguz, Katarzyna Zatonska, Pamela Seron, Alvaro Avezum, Paul Poirier, Koon Teo, Salim Yusuf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,960 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 400 | 14% |
| Spain | 350 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 310 | 10% |
| Canada | 127 | 4% |
| Australia | 121 | 4% |
| Ireland | 32 | 1% |
| Chile | 30 | 1% |
| Japan | 28 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 27 | <1% |
| Other | 467 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1068 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1955 | 66% |
| Scientists | 511 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 437 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 51 | 2% |
| Unknown | 6 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1289 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 163 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 150 | 12% |
| Researcher | 137 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 123 | 10% |
| Other | 83 | 6% |
| Other | 269 | 21% |
| Unknown | 364 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 321 | 25% |
| Sports and Recreations | 119 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 118 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 52 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 3% |
| Other | 196 | 15% |
| Unknown | 443 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2631. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,849
of 25,768,270 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#143
of 42,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24
of 326,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#5
of 408 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,768,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,993 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 408 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.