You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Living in uncertain times: trajectories to death in residential care homes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp14x681397 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Barclay, Katherine Froggatt, Clare Crang, Elspeth Mathie, Melanie Handley, Steve Iliffe, Jill Manthorpe, Heather Gage, Claire Goodman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Canada | 3 | 30% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 31 | 23% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,056,099
of 24,694,993 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,016
of 4,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,003
of 242,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#22
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,694,993 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.