↓ Skip to main content

Living in uncertain times: trajectories to death in residential care homes

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Living in uncertain times: trajectories to death in residential care homes
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, September 2014
DOI 10.3399/bjgp14x681397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Barclay, Katherine Froggatt, Clare Crang, Elspeth Mathie, Melanie Handley, Steve Iliffe, Jill Manthorpe, Heather Gage, Claire Goodman

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 22%
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 9 8%
Other 26 22%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 27%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 18 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,196,894
of 17,595,144 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,450
of 3,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,814
of 207,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#21
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,595,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.