You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Differences in risk-factor profiles between patients with ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a multicentre case-case comparison study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2047-2994-3-27 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua T Freeman, Joseph Rubin, Gary N McAuliffe, Gisele Peirano, Sally A Roberts, Dragana Drinković, Johann DD Pitout |
Abstract |
Generic epidemiological differences between extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-KP), are poorly defined. Nonetheless, defining such differences and understanding their basis could have strategic implications for infection control policy and practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 25% |
United States | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Ethiopia | 1 | 1% |
France | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 18% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
Other | 15 | 20% |
Unknown | 7 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#2,764,079
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#355
of 1,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,672
of 240,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.