↓ Skip to main content

Malaria treatment policy change in Uganda: what role did evidence play?

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Malaria treatment policy change in Uganda: what role did evidence play?
Published in
Malaria Journal, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-345
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliet Nabyonga-Orem, Freddie Ssengooba, Jean Macq, Bart Criel

Abstract

Although increasing attention is being paid to knowledge translation (KT), research findings are not being utilized to the desired extent. The present study explores the role of evidence, barriers, and factors facilitating the uptake of evidence in the change in malaria treatment policy in Uganda, building on previous work in Uganda that led to the development of a middle range theory (MRT) outlining the main facilitatory factors for KT. Application of the MRT to a health policy case will contribute to refining it.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 19%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 14%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#7,475,096
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,071
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,569
of 242,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#40
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.