↓ Skip to main content

An engineered pathway for the biosynthesis of renewable propane

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
Title
An engineered pathway for the biosynthesis of renewable propane
Published in
Nature Communications, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms5731
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauli Kallio, András Pásztor, Kati Thiel, M. Kalim Akhtar, Patrik R. Jones, Kallio P, Pásztor A, Thiel K, Akhtar MK, Jones PR

Abstract

The deployment of next-generation renewable biofuels can be enhanced by improving their compatibility with the current infrastructure for transportation, storage and utilization. Propane, the bulk component of liquid petroleum gas, is an appealing target as it already has a global market. In addition, it is a gas under standard conditions, but can easily be liquefied. This allows the fuel to immediately separate from the biocatalytic process after synthesis, yet does not preclude energy-dense storage as a liquid. Here we report, for the first time, a synthetic metabolic pathway for producing renewable propane. The pathway is based on a thioesterase specific for butyryl-acyl carrier protein (ACP), which allows native fatty acid biosynthesis of the Escherichia coli host to be redirected towards a synthetic alkane pathway. Propane biosynthesis is markedly stimulated by the introduction of an electron-donating module, optimizing the balance of O2 supply and removal of native aldehyde reductases.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 110 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 7 3%
Germany 3 1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 250 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 27%
Researcher 62 23%
Student > Master 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Other 19 7%
Other 59 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 116 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 53 19%
Chemistry 26 9%
Engineering 25 9%
Unspecified 16 6%
Other 38 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 443. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,897
of 12,417,611 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#262
of 20,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279
of 203,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,417,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.