↓ Skip to main content

Dendrogramma, New Genus, with Two New Non-Bilaterian Species from the Marine Bathyal of Southeastern Australia (Animalia, Metazoa incertae sedis) – with Similarities to Some Medusoids from the…

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dendrogramma, New Genus, with Two New Non-Bilaterian Species from the Marine Bathyal of Southeastern Australia (Animalia, Metazoa incertae sedis) – with Similarities to Some Medusoids from the Precambrian Ediacara
Published in
PLoS ONE, September 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0102976
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Just, Reinhardt Møbjerg Kristensen, Jørgen Olesen

Abstract

A new genus, Dendrogramma, with two new species of multicellular, non-bilaterian, mesogleal animals with some bilateral aspects, D. enigmatica and D. discoides, are described from the south-east Australian bathyal (400 and 1000 metres depth). A new family, Dendrogrammatidae, is established for Dendrogramma. These mushroom-shaped organisms cannot be referred to either of the two phyla Ctenophora or Cnidaria at present, because they lack any specialised characters of these taxa. Resolving the phylogenetic position of Dendrogramma depends much on how the basal metazoan lineages (Ctenophora, Porifera, Placozoa, Cnidaria, and Bilateria) are related to each other, a question still under debate. At least Dendrogramma must have branched off before Bilateria and is possibly related to Ctenophora and/or Cnidaria. Dendrogramma, therefore, is referred to Metazoa incertae sedis. The specimens were fixed in neutral formaldehyde and stored in 80% ethanol and are not suitable for molecular analysis. We recommend, therefore, that attempts be made to secure new material for further study. Finally similarities between Dendrogramma and a group of Ediacaran (Vendian) medusoids are discussed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 456 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 5 2%
Spain 4 2%
France 4 2%
Russia 3 1%
Germany 3 1%
Sweden 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 191 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 23%
Researcher 53 23%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Professor 18 8%
Other 45 19%
Unknown 16 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 143 61%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Environmental Science 9 4%
Materials Science 3 1%
Other 10 4%
Unknown 28 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1014. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2020.
All research outputs
#5,614
of 15,387,755 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#95
of 154,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66
of 202,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#3
of 2,675 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,387,755 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,675 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.