↓ Skip to main content

The Anesthetic Effect of Air at Atmospheric Pressure

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesiology, June 1975
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
87 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Anesthetic Effect of Air at Atmospheric Pressure
Published in
Anesthesiology, June 1975
DOI 10.1097/00000542-197506000-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter M. Winter, David L. Bruce, Mary Jean Bach, Gary W. Jay, Edmond I. Eger

Abstract

Nitrogen has recognized narcotic potential at hyperbaric pressures. No narcotic effect of helium has been demonstrated at any pressure. We evaluated the effect of nitrogen in air at one atmosphere on human performance by comparing it with helium-oxygen using a four-alternative divided-attention task that requires rapid response to auditory and visual signal changes. There was a 9.3 per cent decrease in response time when subjects breathed helium-oxygen, a signigicant change (P less than 0.001). This change could not be ascribed to practice since the order of presentation of gases did not have a significant effect. It concluded that the nitrogen in ambient air slightly but measurable impairs human performance compared with a non-anesthetic gas such as helium.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 14%
China 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 57%
Professor 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2024.
All research outputs
#666,663
of 26,616,237 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesiology
#199
of 6,844 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23
of 4,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesiology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,616,237 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,844 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them