↓ Skip to main content

A Gigantic, Exceptionally Complete Titanosaurian Sauropod Dinosaur from Southern Patagonia, Argentina

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 57,604)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A Gigantic, Exceptionally Complete Titanosaurian Sauropod Dinosaur from Southern Patagonia, Argentina
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep06196
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth J. Lacovara, Matthew C. Lamanna, Lucio M. Ibiricu, Jason C. Poole, Elena R. Schroeter, Paul V. Ullmann, Kristyn K. Voegele, Zachary M. Boles, Aja M. Carter, Emma K. Fowler, Victoria M. Egerton, Alison E. Moyer, Christopher L. Coughenour, Jason P. Schein, Jerald D. Harris, Rubén D. Martínez, Fernando E. Novas

Abstract

Titanosaurian sauropod dinosaurs were the most diverse and abundant large-bodied herbivores in the southern continents during the final 30 million years of the Mesozoic Era. Several titanosaur species are regarded as the most massive land-living animals yet discovered; nevertheless, nearly all of these giant titanosaurs are known only from very incomplete fossils, hindering a detailed understanding of their anatomy. Here we describe a new and gigantic titanosaur, Dreadnoughtus schrani, from Upper Cretaceous sediments in southern Patagonia, Argentina. Represented by approximately 70% of the postcranial skeleton, plus craniodental remains, Dreadnoughtus is the most complete giant titanosaur yet discovered, and provides new insight into the morphology and evolutionary history of these colossal animals. Furthermore, despite its estimated mass of about 59.3 metric tons, the bone histology of the Dreadnoughtus type specimen reveals that this individual was still growing at the time of death.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 421 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Spain 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 146 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 37 22%
Student > Bachelor 29 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Master 16 10%
Other 11 7%
Other 44 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 61 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 35%
Unspecified 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 23 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,214
of 12,521,898 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#40
of 57,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39
of 200,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,521,898 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them