↓ Skip to main content

Statins for acute coronary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statins for acute coronary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006870.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vale N, Nordmann AJ, Schwartz GG, de Lemos J, Colivicchi F, den Hartog F, Ostadal P, Macin SM, Liem AH, Mills EJ, Bhatnagar N, Bucher HC, Briel M, Vale, Noah, Nordmann, Alain J, Schwartz, Gregory G, de Lemos, James, Colivicchi, Furio, den Hartog, Frank, Ostadal, Petr, Macin, Stella M, Liem, Anho H, Mills, Edward J, Bhatnagar, Neera, Bucher, Heiner C, Briel, Matthias

Abstract

The early period following the onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a critical stage of coronary heart disease, with a high risk of recurrent events and deaths. The short-term effects of early treatment with statins on patient-relevant outcomes in patients suffering from ACS are unclear. This is an update of a review previously published in 2011.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
Netherlands 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 154 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 19%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Other 14 8%
Other 52 31%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 59%
Unspecified 22 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#1,003,228
of 12,146,908 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,527
of 8,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,982
of 211,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#63
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,146,908 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.