↓ Skip to main content

Statins for acute coronary syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statins for acute coronary syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006870.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah Vale, Alain J Nordmann, Gregory G Schwartz, James de Lemos, Furio Colivicchi, Frank den Hartog, Petr Ostadal, Stella M Macin, Anho H Liem, Edward J Mills, Neera Bhatnagar, Heiner C Bucher, Matthias Briel

Abstract

The early period following the onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) represents a critical stage of coronary heart disease, with a high risk of recurrent events and deaths. The short-term effects of early treatment with statins on patient-relevant outcomes in patients suffering from ACS are unclear. This is an update of a review previously published in 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 17%
Student > Bachelor 37 15%
Researcher 29 12%
Other 20 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 8%
Other 43 17%
Unknown 57 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 66 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#4,145,577
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,429
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,208
of 248,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.