You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000963.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven J Kamper, Andreas T Apeldoorn, Alessandro Chiarotto, Rob J.E.M. Smeets, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Jaime Guzman, Maurits W van Tulder |
| Abstract |
Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for considerable personal suffering worldwide. Those with persistent disabling symptoms also contribute to substantial costs to society via healthcare expenditure and reduced work productivity. While there are many treatment options, none are universally endorsed. The idea that chronic LBP is a condition best understood with reference to an interaction of physical, psychological and social influences, the 'biopsychosocial model', has received increasing acceptance. This has led to the development of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) programs that target factors from the different domains, administered by healthcare professionals from different backgrounds. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 15 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 17% |
| United States | 5 | 7% |
| Spain | 5 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 71% |
| Scientists | 12 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,002 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 987 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 180 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 148 | 15% |
| Researcher | 98 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 92 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 59 | 6% |
| Other | 195 | 19% |
| Unknown | 230 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 279 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 170 | 17% |
| Psychology | 101 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 3% |
| Other | 114 | 11% |
| Unknown | 270 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 440. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#59,141
of 24,247,965 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 12,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#450
of 241,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,247,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.