↓ Skip to main content

Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 10,746)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
44 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
79 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
612 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000963.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J Kamper, Andreas T Apeldoorn, Alessandro Chiarotto, Rob J.E.M. Smeets, Raymond WJG Ostelo, Jaime Guzman, Maurits W van Tulder

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is responsible for considerable personal suffering worldwide. Those with persistent disabling symptoms also contribute to substantial costs to society via healthcare expenditure and reduced work productivity. While there are many treatment options, none are universally endorsed. The idea that chronic LBP is a condition best understood with reference to an interaction of physical, psychological and social influences, the 'biopsychosocial model', has received increasing acceptance. This has led to the development of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation (MBR) programs that target factors from the different domains, administered by healthcare professionals from different backgrounds.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 612 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 595 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 143 23%
Student > Bachelor 88 14%
Unspecified 64 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 64 10%
Researcher 60 10%
Other 193 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 222 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 113 18%
Unspecified 95 16%
Psychology 74 12%
Sports and Recreations 20 3%
Other 88 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 439. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2019.
All research outputs
#22,238
of 13,883,825 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 10,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#304
of 201,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,883,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.