You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining convergence of retrospective and ecological momentary assessment measures of negative affect and eating disorder behaviors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Eating Disorders, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/eat.22352 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph A. Wonderlich, Jason M. Lavender, Stephen A. Wonderlich, Carol B. Peterson, Scott J. Crow, Scott G. Engel, Daniel Le Grange, James E. Mitchell, Ross D. Crosby |
| Abstract |
Data gathered via retrospective forms of assessment are subject to various recall biases. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is an alternative approach involving repeated momentary assessments within a participant's natural environment, thus reducing recall biases and improving ecological validity. EMA has been used in numerous prior studies examining various constructs of theoretical relevance to eating disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 45 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2023.
All research outputs
#6,185,237
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#1,251
of 2,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,838
of 243,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Eating Disorders
#18
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.