You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Insecticide-treated nets ownership and utilization among under-five children following the 2010 mass distribution in Burkina Faso
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-353 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Souleymane Diabaté, Thomas Druetz, Emmanuel Bonnet, Seni Kouanda, Valéry Ridde, Slim Haddad |
Abstract |
Periodic mass distributions contribute significantly to universal access to insecticide-treated nets (ITNs). However, due to the limited number of nets distributed, needs remain unsatisfied, particularly in large households. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Senegal | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nigeria | 2 | 2% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 25% |
Researcher | 13 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 16 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 3% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,013,434
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#904
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,338
of 242,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#21
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.