↓ Skip to main content

An overview of seventy years of research (1944 – 2014) on toxoplasmosis in Colombia, South America

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An overview of seventy years of research (1944 – 2014) on toxoplasmosis in Colombia, South America
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-7-427
Pubmed ID
Authors

William Alberto Cañón-Franco, Natalia López-Orozco, Jorge Enrique Gómez-Marín, Jitender P Dubey

Abstract

This paper summarizes prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in humans and animals and associated correlates of infection, clinical spectrum of disease in humans, and genetic diversity of T. gondii isolates from Colombia. Recent studies, especially in the states of Antioquia, Quindio and Cundinamarca, indicate that toxoplasmosis is a major public health problem. Approximately half of the women of child bearing age have T. gondii antibodies, and the clinical disease in congenitally infected children is more severe than in Europe. Limited studies indicate that the strains of T. gondii from Colombia are genetically and phenotypically different than in Europe and North America. However, epidemiological factors, such as the involvement of domestic and/or wild animals in transmission, the distribution of strain diversity by natural geographic regions, and the variation in risk factors between regions that are associated with human infection in Colombia, remain unknown. Areas of research for the future are outlined. This review should be of interest to biologists, veterinarians, physicians, and parasitologists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 180 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 15 8%
Other 11 6%
Other 39 21%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 30 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,970
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,082
of 249,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#41
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.