↓ Skip to main content

Durable Terrestrial Bedrock Predicts Submarine Canyon Formation

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Durable Terrestrial Bedrock Predicts Submarine Canyon Formation
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/2017gl075139
Authors

M. Elliot Smith, Noah J. Finnegan, Erich R. Mueller, Rebecca J. Best

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 14 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,152,165
of 21,470,856 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#6,706
of 18,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,656
of 296,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#166
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,470,856 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.