↓ Skip to main content

Durable Terrestrial Bedrock Predicts Submarine Canyon Formation

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Durable Terrestrial Bedrock Predicts Submarine Canyon Formation
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/2017gl075139
Authors

M. Elliot Smith, Noah J. Finnegan, Erich R. Mueller, Rebecca J. Best

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 10 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 14 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,936,560
of 24,471,305 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#7,551
of 20,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,930
of 331,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#157
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,471,305 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.