↓ Skip to main content

Durable Terrestrial Bedrock Predicts Submarine Canyon Formation

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Durable Terrestrial Bedrock Predicts Submarine Canyon Formation
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, October 2017
DOI 10.1002/2017gl075139
Authors

M. Elliot Smith, Noah J. Finnegan, Erich R. Mueller, Rebecca J. Best

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 7 47%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 47%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,854,926
of 12,342,171 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#3,755
of 12,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,559
of 274,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#174
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,139 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.