You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
3D spatial conservation prioritisation: Accounting for depth in marine environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12896 |
| Authors |
Rubén Venegas‐Li, Noam Levin, Hugh Possingham, Salit Kark |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| France | 3 | 9% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 19 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Professor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,001,958
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#360
of 2,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,799
of 334,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#11
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.