↓ Skip to main content

3D spatial conservation prioritisation: Accounting for depth in marine environments

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
37 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
3D spatial conservation prioritisation: Accounting for depth in marine environments
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2017
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12896
Authors

Rubén Venegas-Li, Noam Levin, Hugh Possingham, Salit Kark

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Master 5 15%
Professor 4 12%
Unspecified 4 12%
Other 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 10 29%
Unspecified 10 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#335,529
of 12,379,581 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#142
of 1,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,409
of 273,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,379,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.