You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Component resolved diagnosis: when should it be used?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-4-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olga Luengo, Victòria Cardona |
| Abstract |
The knowledge on molecular allergy diagnosis is continuously evolving. It is now time for the clinician to integrate this knowledge and use it when needed to improve the accuracy of diagnosis and thus provide more precise therapeutic and avoidance measures. This review does not intend to comprehensively analyze all the available allergen molecules, but to provide some practical clues on use and interpretation of molecular allergy diagnosis. The potential role of component resolved diagnosis in circumstances such as the indication of allergen immunotherapy, pollen polysensitization, food allergy, latex allergy or anaphylaxis, is assessed. Interpreting the information provided by molecular allergy diagnosis needs a structured approach. It is necessary to evaluate single positivities and negativities, but also to appraise "the big picture" with perspective. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Romania | 1 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,600,526
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#143
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,859
of 250,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.