↓ Skip to main content

Do large-scale hospital- and system-wide interventions improve patient outcomes: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do large-scale hospital- and system-wide interventions improve patient outcomes: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-369
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robyn Clay-Williams, Hadis Nosrati, Frances C Cunningham, Kenneth Hillman, Jeffrey Braithwaite

Abstract

While health care services are beginning to implement system-wide patient safety interventions, evidence on the efficacy of these interventions is sparse. We know that uptake can be variable, but we do not know the factors that affect uptake or how the interventions establish change and, in particular, whether they influence patient outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to identify how organisational and cultural factors mediate or are mediated by hospital-wide interventions, and to assess the effects of those factors on patient outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 16%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 12%
Other 10 8%
Other 25 21%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Social Sciences 13 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 18 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,890,307
of 18,812,327 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,227
of 6,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,551
of 211,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,812,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,321 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them