You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Glutamine supplementation for critically ill adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd010050.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kun‐Ming Tao, Xiao‐Qian Li, Li‐Qun Yang, Wei‐Feng Yu, Zhi‐Jie Lu, Yu‐Ming Sun, Fei‐Xiang Wu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 28% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Monaco | 1 | 6% |
| Argentina | 1 | 6% |
| China | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 294 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Researcher | 34 | 11% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 61 | 21% |
| Unknown | 77 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 13% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 32 | 11% |
| Unknown | 92 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,457,117
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,976
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,281
of 249,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#88
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.