↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy: recruitment, refusal, randomisation and…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a nurse-led palliative care intervention for HIV positive patients on antiretroviral therapy: recruitment, refusal, randomisation and missing data
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keira Lowther, Irene J Higginson, Victoria Simms, Nancy Gikaara, Aabid Ahmed, Zipporah Ali, Gaudencia Afuande, Hellen Kariuki, Lorraine Sherr, Rachel Jenkins, Lucy Selman, Richard Harding

Abstract

Despite the life threatening nature of an HIV diagnosis and the multidimensional problems experienced by this patient population during antiretroviral therapy, the effectiveness of a palliative care approach for HIV positive patients on ART is as yet unknown.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 19%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 32 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Psychology 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 38 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2015.
All research outputs
#15,298,110
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,763
of 4,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,211
of 249,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#59
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.