↓ Skip to main content

Reconstruction option of abdominal wounds with large tissue defects

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Surgery, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reconstruction option of abdominal wounds with large tissue defects
Published in
BMC Surgery, August 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2482-14-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Hutan, Christian Bartko, Ivan Majesky, Augustin Prochotsky, Jaroslav Sekac, Jan Skultety

Abstract

Abdominal wall defects result from trauma, abdominal wall tumors, necrotizing infections or complications of previous abdominal surgeries. Apart from cosmetics, abdominal wall defects have strong negative functional impact on the patients.Many different techniques exist for abdominal wall repair. Most problematic and troublesome are defects, where major part of abdominal wall had to be resected and tissue for transfer or reconstruction is absent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Master 5 12%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Psychology 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,200,249
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Surgery
#265
of 1,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,908
of 230,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Surgery
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,319 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.