↓ Skip to main content

Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Epidemiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
97 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
652 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
406 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations
Published in
International Journal of Epidemiology, September 2017
DOI 10.1093/ije/dyx206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcus R Munafò, Kate Tilling, Amy E Taylor, David M Evans, George Davey Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 406 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 406 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 98 24%
Researcher 83 20%
Student > Master 39 10%
Student > Bachelor 25 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 73 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 22%
Psychology 37 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 7%
Social Sciences 21 5%
Other 85 21%
Unknown 111 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#613,442
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Epidemiology
#283
of 5,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,745
of 330,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Epidemiology
#5
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.