↓ Skip to main content

Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Compression for preventing recurrence of venous ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002303.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Andrea Nelson, Sally EM Bell-Syer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 193 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 20%
Student > Master 27 14%
Unspecified 22 11%
Student > Postgraduate 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Other 70 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 88 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 24%
Unspecified 29 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 19 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,583,062
of 13,278,410 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,275
of 10,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,005
of 202,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,278,410 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.