The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Written and verbal information versus verbal information only for patients being discharged from acute hospital settings to home
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2003
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003716 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anne Johnson, Jayne Sandford, Jessica Tyndall |
Abstract |
It is becoming commonplace for patients to be discharged earlier from acute hospital settings to their own homes and be required to manage various aspects of their own care. This has increased the need for detailed information to be given to patients and/or significant others to enable them to effectively manage care at home. It has been suggested that providing written health information can assist in this self management. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 1% |
United States | 3 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Iceland | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 292 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 49 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 12% |
Researcher | 33 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
Other | 57 | 19% |
Unknown | 70 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 31% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 12% |
Psychology | 27 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 3% |
Other | 42 | 14% |
Unknown | 79 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2022.
All research outputs
#849,985
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,644
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#733
of 56,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.