↓ Skip to main content

Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
440 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying and prioritizing ungulate migration routes for landscape-level conservation
Published in
Ecological Applications, December 2009
DOI 10.1890/08-2034.1
Authors

Hall Sawyer, Matthew J. Kauffman, Ryan M. Nielson, Jon S. Horne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belize 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 407 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 110 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 21%
Student > Master 84 19%
Student > Bachelor 44 10%
Other 19 4%
Other 49 11%
Unknown 42 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 229 52%
Environmental Science 107 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Social Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Other 18 4%
Unknown 65 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,214,427
of 20,618,952 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#818
of 3,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,928
of 215,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,618,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.