↓ Skip to main content

Molecular and functional characterization of cold-responsive C-repeat binding factors from Brachypodium distachyon

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Molecular and functional characterization of cold-responsive C-repeat binding factors from Brachypodium distachyon
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-14-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jae Yong Ryu, Shin-Young Hong, Sin-Hye Jo, Je-Chang Woo, Sangmin Lee, Chung-Mo Park

Abstract

Adverse environmental conditions severely influence various aspects of plant growth and developmental processes, causing worldwide reduction of crop yields. The C-repeat binding factors (CBFs) are critical transcription factors constituting the gene regulatory network that mediates the acclimation process to low temperatures. They regulate a large number of cold-responsive genes, including COLD-REGULATED (COR) genes, via the CBF-COR regulon. Recent studies have shown that the CBF transcription factors also play a role in plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Putative CBF gene homologues and their downstream genes are also present in the genome of Brachypodium distachyon, which is perceived as a monocot model in recent years. However, they have not been functionally characterized at the molecular level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 27%
Researcher 12 20%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 6 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 22%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,236,620
of 22,763,032 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#2,504
of 3,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,358
of 304,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#69
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,763,032 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.