↓ Skip to main content

Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vaginal dilator therapy for women receiving pelvic radiotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007291.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tracie Miles, Nick Johnson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 10 8%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 17%
Psychology 9 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 34 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,231,175
of 15,149,790 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,409
of 11,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,702
of 203,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#67
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,149,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.