↓ Skip to main content

Surgery for lateral elbow pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgery for lateral elbow pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003525.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachelle Buchbinder, Renea V Johnston, Les Barnsley, Willem JJ Assendelft, Simon N Bell, Nynke Smidt

Abstract

Surgery is sometimes recommended for persistent lateral elbow pain where other less invasive interventions have failed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 134 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 28%
Student > Bachelor 19 14%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Other 13 9%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 13%
Psychology 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 19 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,771,432
of 14,259,178 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,607
of 10,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,715
of 202,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,259,178 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.