↓ Skip to main content

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) plus delayed defibrillation versus immediate defibrillation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009803.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yu Huang, Qing He, Li J Yang, Guan J Liu, Alexander Jones

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 19 16%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Researcher 14 12%
Other 39 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 45%
Unspecified 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 18 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#667,021
of 12,520,820 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,054
of 8,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,279
of 202,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,520,820 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.