Chapter title |
Acute Brain Slice Methods for Adult and Aging Animals: Application of Targeted Patch Clamp Analysis and Optogenetics
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 14 |
Book title |
Patch-Clamp Methods and Protocols
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-1096-0_14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-1095-3, 978-1-4939-1096-0
|
Authors |
Jonathan T. Ting, Tanya L. Daigle, Qian Chen, Guoping Feng, Ting, Jonathan T., Daigle, Tanya L., Chen, Qian, Feng, Guoping |
Abstract |
The development of the living acute brain slice preparation for analyzing synaptic function roughly a half century ago was a pivotal achievement that greatly influenced the landscape of modern neuroscience. Indeed, many neuroscientists regard brain slices as the gold-standard model system for detailed cellular, molecular, and circuitry level analysis and perturbation of neuronal function. A critical limitation of this model system is the difficulty in preparing slices from adult and aging animals, and over the past several decades few substantial methodological improvements have emerged to facilitate patch clamp analysis in the mature adult stage. In this chapter we describe a robust and practical protocol for preparing brain slices from mature adult mice that are suitable for patch clamp analysis. This method reduces swelling and damage in superficial layers of the slices and improves the success rate for targeted patch clamp recordings, including recordings from fluorescently labeled populations in slices derived from transgenic mice. This adult brain slice method is suitable for diverse experimental applications, including both monitoring and manipulating neuronal activity with genetically encoded calcium indicators and optogenetic actuators, respectively. We describe the application of this adult brain slice platform and associated methods for screening kinetic properties of Channelrhodopsin (ChR) variants expressed in genetically defined neuronal subtypes. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Hungary | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Romania | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | <1% |
Unknown | 551 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 147 | 26% |
Researcher | 96 | 17% |
Student > Master | 65 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 6% |
Other | 69 | 12% |
Unknown | 107 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Neuroscience | 228 | 40% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 119 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 3% |
Engineering | 17 | 3% |
Other | 34 | 6% |
Unknown | 121 | 21% |