↓ Skip to main content

Statistically controlled identification of differentially expressed genes in one-to-one cell line comparisons of the CMAP database for drug repositioning

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistically controlled identification of differentially expressed genes in one-to-one cell line comparisons of the CMAP database for drug repositioning
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, September 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12967-017-1302-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jun He, Haidan Yan, Hao Cai, Xiangyu Li, Qingzhou Guan, Weicheng Zheng, Rou Chen, Huaping Liu, Kai Song, Zheng Guo, Xianlong Wang

Abstract

The Connectivity Map (CMAP) database, an important public data source for drug repositioning, archives gene expression profiles from cancer cell lines treated with and without bioactive small molecules. However, there are only one or two technical replicates for each cell line under one treatment condition. For such small-scale data, current fold-changes-based methods lack statistical control in identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in treated cells. Especially, one-to-one comparison may result in too many drug-irrelevant DEGs due to random experimental factors. To tackle this problem, CMAP adopts a pattern-matching strategy to build "connection" between disease signatures and gene expression changes associated with drug treatments. However, many drug-irrelevant genes may blur the "connection" if all the genes are used instead of pre-selected DEGs induced by drug treatments. We applied OneComp, a customized version of RankComp, to identify DEGs in such small-scale cell line datasets. For a cell line, a list of gene pairs with stable relative expression orderings (REOs) were identified in a large collection of control cell samples measured in different experiments and they formed the background stable REOs. When applying OneComp to a small-scale cell line dataset, the background stable REOs were customized by filtering out the gene pairs with reversal REOs in the control samples of the analyzed dataset. In simulated data, the consistency scores of overlapping genes between DEGs identified by OneComp and SAM were all higher than 99%, while the consistency score of the DEGs solely identified by OneComp was 96.85% according to the observed expression difference method. The usefulness of OneComp was exemplified in drug repositioning by identifying phenformin and metformin related genes using small-scale cell line datasets which helped to support them as a potential anti-tumor drug for non-small-cell lung carcinoma, while the pattern-matching strategy adopted by CMAP missed the two connections. The implementation of OneComp is available at https://github.com/pathint/reoa . OneComp performed well in both the simulated and real data. It is useful in drug repositioning studies by helping to find hidden "connections" between drugs and diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 25%
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Engineering 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 6 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2017.
All research outputs
#19,017,658
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#3,088
of 4,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,662
of 322,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#53
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.