↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
77 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
375 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

France Légaré, Dawn Stacey, Stéphane Turcotte, Marie-Joëlle Cossi, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Ian D Graham, Anne Lyddiatt, Mary C Politi, Richard Thomson, Glyn Elwyn, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 375 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Canada 6 2%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 353 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 15%
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 36 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 7%
Other 99 26%
Unknown 40 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 154 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 12%
Psychology 30 8%
Social Sciences 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 2%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 70 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#346,154
of 15,132,677 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#832
of 11,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,393
of 204,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,132,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.