↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
76 tweeters
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
282 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
411 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for improving the adoption of shared decision making by healthcare professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006732.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

France Légaré, Dawn Stacey, Stéphane Turcotte, Marie-Joëlle Cossi, Jennifer Kryworuchko, Ian D Graham, Anne Lyddiatt, Mary C Politi, Richard Thomson, Glyn Elwyn, Norbert Donner-Banzhoff

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 411 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Canada 6 1%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 389 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 15%
Researcher 58 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 7%
Other 105 26%
Unknown 50 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 161 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 13%
Psychology 31 8%
Social Sciences 25 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 2%
Other 51 12%
Unknown 82 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2019.
All research outputs
#403,500
of 16,399,557 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#937
of 11,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,632
of 206,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,399,557 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,323 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.