You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
The Use of Remote Camera Trapping to Study Cheetahs: Past Reflections and Future Directions
|
|---|---|
| Book title |
Cheetahs: Biology and Conservation
|
| Published in |
US Geological Survey, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/b978-0-12-804088-1.00029-0 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-0-12-804088-1
|
| Authors |
Ezequiel Fabiano, Lorraine K. Boast, Angela K. Fuller, Chris Sutherland, Ezequiel Fabiano, , Lorraine Boast, , Fuller, Angela K., Chris Sutherland, |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,491,151
of 23,112,054 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#193
of 2,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,239
of 442,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#27
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,112,054 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.