↓ Skip to main content

Circulating tumor cells as early predictors of metastatic spread in breast cancer patients with limited metastatic dissemination

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Circulating tumor cells as early predictors of metastatic spread in breast cancer patients with limited metastatic dissemination
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13058-014-0440-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mario Giuliano, Antonio Giordano, Summer Jackson, Ugo De Giorgi, Michal Mego, Evan N Cohen, Hui Gao, Simone Anfossi, Beverly C Handy, Naoto T Ueno, Ricardo H Alvarez, Sabino De Placido, Vicente Valero, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, James M Reuben, Massimo Cristofanilli

Abstract

Traditional factors currently used for prognostic stratification do not always adequately predict treatment response and disease evolution in advanced breast cancer patients. Therefore, the use of blood-based markers, such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs), represents a promising complementary strategy for disease monitoring. In this retrospective study, we explored the role of CTC counts as predictors of disease evolution in breast cancer patients with limited metastatic dissemination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Unknown 108 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Other 16 14%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Engineering 7 6%
Physics and Astronomy 5 4%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 30 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,760,513
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#545
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,546
of 246,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.