↓ Skip to main content

Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination

Overview of attention for article published in Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,456)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
83 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
230 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surface micropattern limits bacterial contamination
Published in
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/2047-2994-3-28
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ethan E Mann, Dipankar Manna, Michael R Mettetal, Rhea M May, Elisa M Dannemiller, Kenneth K Chung, Anthony B Brennan, Shravanthi T Reddy

Abstract

Bacterial surface contamination contributes to transmission of nosocomial infections. Chemical cleansers used to control surface contamination are often toxic and incorrectly implemented. Additional non-toxic strategies should be combined with regular cleanings to mitigate risks of human error and further decrease rates of nosocomial infections. The Sharklet micropattern (MP), inspired by shark skin, is an effective tool for reducing bacterial load on surfaces without toxic additives. The studies presented here were carried out to investigate the MP surfaces capability to reduce colonization of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) compared to smooth control surfaces.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 230 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 227 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 45 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Master 19 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 3%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 63 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 31 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 9%
Materials Science 17 7%
Chemistry 16 7%
Other 53 23%
Unknown 70 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 681. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#30,787
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#5
of 1,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184
of 259,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.