You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Specific IgE to fish extracts does not predict allergy to specific species within an adult fish allergic population
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2045-7022-4-27 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Karlijn JG Schulkes, Rob JB Klemans, Lidy Knigge, Marjolein de Bruin-Weller, Carla AFM Bruijnzeel-Koomen, Åsa Marknell deWitt, Jonas Lidholm, André C Knulst |
Abstract |
Fish is an important cause of food allergy. Studies on fish allergy are scarce and in most cases limited to serological evaluation. Our objective was to study patterns of self-reported allergy and tolerance to different commonly consumed fish species and its correlation to IgE sensitization to the same species. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
Chile | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 22% |
Unknown | 9 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,186,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#428
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,701
of 248,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.