You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of the size-selective silver clusters on lithium peroxide morphology in lithium–oxygen batteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms5895 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jun Lu, Lei Cheng, Kah Chun Lau, Eric Tyo, Xiangyi Luo, Jianguo Wen, Dean Miller, Rajeev S. Assary, Hsien-Hau Wang, Paul Redfern, Huiming Wu, Jin-Bum Park, Yang-Kook Sun, Stefan Vajda, Khalil Amine, Larry A. Curtiss |
| Abstract |
Lithium-oxygen batteries have the potential needed for long-range electric vehicles, but the charge and discharge chemistries are complex and not well understood. The active sites on cathode surfaces and their role in electrochemical reactions in aprotic lithium-oxygen cells are difficult to ascertain because the exact nature of the sites is unknown. Here we report the deposition of subnanometre silver clusters of exact size and number of atoms on passivated carbon to study the discharge process in lithium-oxygen cells. The results reveal dramatically different morphologies of the electrochemically grown lithium peroxide dependent on the size of the clusters. This dependence is found to be due to the influence of the cluster size on the formation mechanism, which also affects the charge process. The results of this study suggest that precise control of subnanometre surface structure on cathodes can be used as a means to improve the performance of lithium-oxygen cells. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 30% |
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 34 | 27% |
| Engineering | 16 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 16 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 9 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#1,102,009
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#16,835
of 46,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,589
of 243,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#187
of 655 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 655 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.