↓ Skip to main content

Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
26 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001478.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linjie Zhang, Sílvio OM Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 101 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 23 22%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 17 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2020.
All research outputs
#586,830
of 14,364,599 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,714
of 10,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,015
of 208,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,364,599 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.