↓ Skip to main content

Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acellular vaccines for preventing whooping cough in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001478.pub6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linjie Zhang, Sílvio OM Prietsch, Inge Axelsson, Scott A Halperin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 113 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 15 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 19 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2020.
All research outputs
#681,678
of 14,537,063 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,039
of 10,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,392
of 208,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,537,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.