↓ Skip to main content

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for panic disorder in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009083.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Li, Jijun Wang, Chunbo Li, Zeping Xiao

Abstract

Panic disorder (PD) is a common type of anxiety disorder, characterized by unexpected and repeated panic attacks or fear of future panic attacks, or both. Individuals with PD are often resistant to pharmacological or psychological treatments and this can lead to the disorder becoming a chronic and disabling illness. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can deliver sustained and spatially selective current to suppress or induce cortical excitability, and its therapeutic effect on pathological neuronal activity in people with PD has already been examined in case studies and clinical trials. However, a systematic review is necessary to assess the efficacy and safety of rTMS for PD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 137 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 21%
Unspecified 26 19%
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 35%
Unspecified 33 24%
Psychology 25 18%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,347,748
of 13,584,320 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,068
of 10,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,769
of 207,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,584,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.