↓ Skip to main content

An adaptogenic role for omega-3 fatty acids in stress; a randomised placebo controlled double blind intervention study (pilot) [ISRCTN22569553]

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An adaptogenic role for omega-3 fatty acids in stress; a randomised placebo controlled double blind intervention study (pilot) [ISRCTN22569553]
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2004
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-3-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanne Bradbury, Stephen P Myers, Chris Oliver

Abstract

There is evidence for an adaptive role of the omega -3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) during stress. Mechanisms of action may involve regulation of stress mediators, such as the catecholamines and proinflammatory cytokines. Prevention of stress-induced aggression and hostility were demonstrated in a series of clinical trials. This study investigates whether perceived stress is ameliorated by DHA in stressed university staff.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 27%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 17 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Psychology 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,645,942
of 23,379,207 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#662
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,499
of 142,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,379,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.