↓ Skip to main content

Imaging Flow Cytometry

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Imaging Flow Cytometry'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Quantitative Functional Morphology by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Principles of Amnis Imaging Flow Cytometry
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Ultrafast Microfluidic Cellular Imaging by Optical Time-Stretch
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Applications of Imaging Flow Cytometry for Microalgae
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 The Analysis of Cell Cycle, Proliferation, and Asymmetric Cell Division by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Quantitation of Chromosome Damage by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization in Suspension by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Analysis of Nucleocytoplasmic Protein Shuttling by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Using Image-Based Flow Cytometry with a FISH-Based FlowRNA Assay to Simultaneously Detect Intracellular TNF-α Protein and mRNA in Monocytes Following LPS Stimulation
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Multiparametric Characterization of Human T-Cell Immune Synapses by InFlow Microscopy
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Studying T Cells N-Glycosylation by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Assessment of Granulocyte Subset Activation: New Information from Image-Based Flow Cytometry
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Using Image-Based Flow Cytometry to Assess Monocyte Oxidized LDL Phagocytosis Capacity
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Imaging Flow Cytometry
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Accurate Assessment of Cell Death by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Imaging Flow Cytometry
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 FlowCam: Quantification and Classification of Phytoplankton by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Detection and Characterization of Rare Circulating Endothelial Cells by Imaging Flow Cytometry
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Imaging Flow Cytometric Analysis of Primary Bone Marrow Megakaryocytes
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Sickle Cell Imaging Flow Cytometry Assay (SIFCA)
Attention for Chapter 17: FlowCam: Quantification and Classification of Phytoplankton by Imaging Flow Cytometry
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
FlowCam: Quantification and Classification of Phytoplankton by Imaging Flow Cytometry
Chapter number 17
Book title
Imaging Flow Cytometry
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-3302-0_17
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-3300-6, 978-1-4939-3302-0
Authors

Nicole J. Poulton, Poulton, Nicole J.

Abstract

The ability to enumerate, classify, and determine biomass of phytoplankton from environmental samples is essential for determining ecosystem function and their role in the aquatic community and microbial food web. Traditional micro-phytoplankton quantification methods using microscopic techniques require preservation and are slow, tedious and very laborious. The availability of more automated imaging microscopy platforms has revolutionized the way particles and cells are detected within their natural environment. The ability to examine cells unaltered and without preservation is key to providing more accurate cell concentration estimates and overall phytoplankton biomass. The FlowCam(®) is an imaging cytometry tool that was originally developed for use in aquatic sciences and provides a more rapid and unbiased method for enumerating and classifying phytoplankton within diverse aquatic environments.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 20%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 10 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 20%
Engineering 3 9%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,577,096
of 23,106,934 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#2,350
of 13,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,975
of 395,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#269
of 1,471 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,934 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,471 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.