↓ Skip to main content

Global climate change and contaminants, a call to arms not yet heard?

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global climate change and contaminants, a call to arms not yet heard?
Published in
Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management, September 2014
DOI 10.1002/ieam.1568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wayne G Landis, Jason R Rohr, S Jannicke Moe, John M Balbus, William Clements, Alyce Fritz, Roger Helm, Christopher Hickey, Michael Hooper, Ralph G Stahl, Jenny Stauber

Abstract

A consensus has existed from the mid-2000s that climate change is occurring and is the result of anthropogenic causes (Oreskes 2004). Noyes et al. (2009) published the first description of the potential interactions between a warming environment and toxicology. Four years ago, an editorial in Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (Wenning et al. 2010) called upon members of SETAC to develop research on the potential interactions between global climate change (GCC) and environmental contaminants. Integr Environ Assess Manag © 2014 SETAC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 31%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#4,659,159
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#116
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,864
of 260,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Environmental Assessment & Management
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.