↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Application of next generation sequencing to CEPH cell lines to discover variants associated with FDA approved chemotherapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Application of next generation sequencing to CEPH cell lines to discover variants associated with FDA approved chemotherapeutics
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-652
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunjan D Hariani, Ernest T Lam, Tammy Havener, Pui-Yan Kwok, Howard L McLeod, Michael J Wagner, Alison A Motsinger-Reif

Abstract

After publication of this work [1], it has come to our attention that there is an error in the author list of the initial version of this manuscript: rather than Earnest J Lam, the second author of the manuscript should be listed as Earnest T Lam. We publish this correction to update the author list with this information. The correct author list is as follows: Gunjan D Hariani, Ernest T Lam, Tammy Havener, Pui-Yan Kwok, Howard L McLeod, Michael J Wagner and Alison A Motsinger-Reif This error was introduced during the final production process and the editors of BMC Research Notes apologise for any inconvenience caused. References 1. Hariani et al.: Application of next generation sequencing to CEPH cell lines to discover variants associated with FDA approved chemotherapeutics. BMC Research Notes 2014 7:360.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#20,237,640
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#3,559
of 4,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,367
of 249,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#129
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.