↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Application of next generation sequencing to CEPH cell lines to discover variants associated with FDA approved chemotherapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Correction: Application of next generation sequencing to CEPH cell lines to discover variants associated with FDA approved chemotherapeutics
Published in
BMC Research Notes, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-7-652
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunjan D Hariani, Ernest T Lam, Tammy Havener, Pui-Yan Kwok, Howard L McLeod, Michael J Wagner, Alison A Motsinger-Reif

Abstract

After publication of this work [1], it has come to our attention that there is an error in the author list of the initial version of this manuscript: rather than Earnest J Lam, the second author of the manuscript should be listed as Earnest T Lam. We publish this correction to update the author list with this information. The correct author list is as follows: Gunjan D Hariani, Ernest T Lam, Tammy Havener, Pui-Yan Kwok, Howard L McLeod, Michael J Wagner and Alison A Motsinger-Reif This error was introduced during the final production process and the editors of BMC Research Notes apologise for any inconvenience caused. References 1. Hariani et al.: Application of next generation sequencing to CEPH cell lines to discover variants associated with FDA approved chemotherapeutics. BMC Research Notes 2014 7:360.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#3,570,444
of 4,507,652 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,034
of 1,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,223
of 118,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#93
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,507,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,369 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.