↓ Skip to main content

The evaluation of anaemia in an older primary care population: retrospective population-based study

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
The evaluation of anaemia in an older primary care population: retrospective population-based study
Published in
BJGP Open, October 2017
DOI 10.3399/bjgpopen17x101157
Authors

David McCartney, Brian Shine, Deborah Hay, Daniel S Lasserson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2017.
All research outputs
#937,385
of 8,620,139 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#15
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,753
of 186,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,620,139 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.