You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating vegetation biomass and cover across large plots in shrub and grass dominated drylands using terrestrial lidar and machine learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Indicators, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.09.034 |
| Authors |
Kyle E. Anderson, Nancy F. Glenn, Lucas P. Spaete, Douglas J. Shinneman, David S. Pilliod, Robert S. Arkle, Susan K. McIlroy, DeWayne R. Derryberry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 151 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 17% |
| Researcher | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 31 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,787,133
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Indicators
#1,982
of 3,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,574
of 449,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Indicators
#65
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.