You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determination of the 3D shape of a nanoscale crystal with atomic resolution from a single image
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Materials, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmat4087 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. L. Jia, S. B. Mi, J. Barthel, D. W. Wang, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, K. W. Urban, A. Thust |
| Abstract |
Although the overall atomic structure of a nanoscale crystal is in principle accessible by modern transmission electron microscopy, the precise determination of its surface structure is an intricate problem. Here, we show that aberration-corrected transmission electron microscopy, combined with dedicated numerical evaluation procedures, allows the three-dimensional shape of a thin MgO crystal to be determined from only one single high-resolution image. The sensitivity of the reconstruction procedure is not only sufficient to reveal the surface morphology of the crystal with atomic resolution, but also to detect the presence of adsorbed impurity atoms. The single-image approach that we introduce offers important advantages for three-dimensional studies of radiation-sensitive crystals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 18% |
| Germany | 2 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 179 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 29% |
| Researcher | 47 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 77 | 40% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 36 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 35 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#489,502
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#503
of 4,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,330
of 252,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.