You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Alignment-free sequence comparison: benefits, applications, and tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-017-1319-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrzej Zielezinski, Susana Vinga, Jonas Almeida, Wojciech M. Karlowski |
| Abstract |
Alignment-free sequence analyses have been applied to problems ranging from whole-genome phylogeny to the classification of protein families, identification of horizontally transferred genes, and detection of recombined sequences. The strength of these methods makes them particularly useful for next-generation sequencing data processing and analysis. However, many researchers are unclear about how these methods work, how they compare to alignment-based methods, and what their potential is for use for their research. We address these questions and provide a guide to the currently available alignment-free sequence analysis tools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 9% |
| Germany | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| France | 6 | 4% |
| India | 5 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 16% |
| Unknown | 40 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 83 | 61% |
| Members of the public | 52 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 634 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 634 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 128 | 20% |
| Researcher | 105 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 88 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 81 | 13% |
| Other | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 83 | 13% |
| Unknown | 124 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 193 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 131 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 75 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 3% |
| Engineering | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 58 | 9% |
| Unknown | 144 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#528,957
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#298
of 4,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,119
of 332,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#7
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.