↓ Skip to main content

The role of Probiotics in allergic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 924)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of Probiotics in allergic diseases
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/1710-1492-5-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia Michail

Abstract

Allergic disorders are very common in the pediatric age group. While the exact etiology is unclear, evidence is mounting to incriminate environmental factors and an aberrant gut microbiota with a shift of the Th1/Th2 balance towards a Th2 response. Probiotics have been shown to modulate the immune system back to a Th1 response. Several in vitro studies suggest a role for probiotics in treating allergic disorders. Human trials demonstrate a limited benefit for the use of probiotics in atopic dermatitis in a preventive as well as a therapeutic capacity. Data supporting their use in allergic rhinitis are less robust. Currently, there is no role for probiotic therapy in the treatment of bronchial asthma. Future studies will be critical in determining the exact role of probiotics in allergic disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 9 8%
Researcher 7 6%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#559,395
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#26
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,273
of 107,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them